![]() ![]() ![]() | CuFe2P EN: CW107C UNS: C19400 | ![]() |
High strength modified copper alloy, best combinations of electrical conductivity, mechanical strength, forming properties and stress relaxation resistance.
CuFe2p fits applications requiring excellent hot and cold workability as well as high strength and conductivity. Alloy CuFe2P can be used when copper C1100 and others lack sufficient strength. Furthermore, CuFe2P resistance to softening allows it to retain strength after extended periods at elevated temperatures. CuFe2P can be selected to replece the brass alloys when improved solderability is required.
Heat capacity of CuFePZn (Fe:2,4, Zn:0,12, P:0,03%) vs temperature
Electrical conductivity requirements according standard ASTM B465
Temper | Electrical conductivty, MS/m | Electrical conductivity, % IACS | Literature |
---|---|---|---|
O50 | 37,7-43,5 | 65-75 | |
O60 | 37,7-43,5 | 65-75 | |
O61 | 37,7-43,5 | 65-75 | |
O62 | 37,7-43,5 | 65-75 | |
H01 | Min 35 | min.60 | |
H02 | Min 35 | min.60 | |
H03 | Min 35 | min.60 | |
H04 | Min 35 | min.60 | |
HO6 | Min 35 | min.60 | |
HO8 | Min 35 | min.60 | |
H10 | Min 35 | min.60 | |
H14 | Min 35 | min.60 |
Electrical conductivity requirements of C19400 for lead frames
Name of alloy | Electrical conductivty, MS/m | Electrical conductivity, % IACS | Source |
---|---|---|---|
Lead frame alloy | Min38 | Min 60 |
Thermal conductivity and electrical conductivity for CuFe2P (C19400) and different copper alloys
Circuit breaker components, contact springs, electrical clamps, springs, terminal, flexible hose, fuse clips, gaskets, gift hollowware, plug contacts, rivets, nit, welded condenser tubes, semiconductor lead frames, cable shielding. Literature:
Product | Specification |
---|---|
Bar, Rolled | ASTM B465 |
Plate | ASTM B465 |
Sheet | ASTM B465, B694 |
Strip | ASTM B465, B888, B694 |
Tube, Welded | ASME SB543 |
Chemical composition
![]() |
Value | Comments | |
Cu [ wt.% ] | 97,02-97,835 | Calculated | |
Fe [ wt.% ] | 2,1-2,6 | ||
P [ wt.% ] | 0,015-0,15 | ||
Pb [ wt.% ] | 0-0,03 | ||
Zn [ wt.% ] | 0,05-0,20 |
Chemical composition of CW107C according ASTM
Chemical composition, wt.% | ||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Ag | Mg | Sn | Ni | Si | Cr | Zr | Fe | P | Pb | Zn | other | Cu |
- | - | - | - | - | - | - | 2.1-2.6 | 0.015-0.15 | max. 0.03 | 0.05-0.20 | - | min. 97.7 |
Chemical composition of CW107C according MATWEB
Chemical composition, wt.% | ||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Ag | Mg | Sn | Ni | Si | Cr | Zr | Fe | P | Pb | Zn | other | Cu |
- | - | max 0.03 | - | - | - | - | 2.1-2.6 | 0.015-0.15 | max. 0.03 | 0.05-0.20 | max 0.15 | min. 97.0 |
Chemical composition of CW107C according Wieland
Chemical composition, wt.% | ||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Ag | Mg | Sn | Ni | Si | Cr | Zr | Fe | P | Pb | Zn | other | Cu |
- | - | - | - | - | - |
| 2.4 | 0.03 | - | 0.12 | Max 0.2 | min. 97.0 |
Chemical composition of CW107C according KME
Chemical composition, wt.% | ||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Ag | Mg | Sn | Ni | Si | Cr | Zr | Fe | P | Pb | Zn | other | Cu |
- | Max0.1 | - | - | - | - | - | 2.1-2.6 | 0.015-0.15 | - | 0.05-0.20 | Max 0.2 | min. 97.0 |
Mechanical properties
|
||||||
UTS [MPa] | YS [MPa] | Elongation [%] | Hardness | Young’s modulus [GPa] | Kirchhoff’s modulus [GPa] | Poisson ratio |
275-570 | 110-480 | 2-30 | 80-170 | 115 | 44 | 0,33 |
Mechanical requirements according ASTM standards (different tempers)
Temper |
Tensile strength, MPa |
Yield strength 0,2%, MPa |
Elongation A50, % |
Literature |
---|---|---|---|---|
O61 |
275-435 |
110 |
10 |
|
H02 |
365-435 |
250 |
6 |
|
H04 |
415-485 |
365 |
3 |
|
H06 |
460-505 |
440 |
2 |
|
H08 |
485-525 |
460 |
2 |
|
H10 |
505-550 |
485 |
1 |
Mechanical properties of flat products, 0,64 mm thick
Temper |
Tensile strength, MPa |
Yield strength, 0,2%, MPa |
Elongation A50 mm, % |
Literature |
---|---|---|---|---|
O60 |
310 |
Max 150 |
Min 29 |
|
O50 |
345 |
160 |
6 |
|
HO4 |
440 |
435 |
4 |
|
HO8 |
490 |
480 |
2 |
Mechanical properties according DIN EN 12449 (R300 wall thikckness – 10 mm, R70, R420 – wall thickness 5mm)
Temper |
Tensile strength, MPa |
Yield strength, 0,2%, MPa |
Elongation A50 mm, % |
---|---|---|---|
R300 |
310 |
Max 150 |
Min 29 |
R370 |
370 |
250 |
15 |
R420 |
440 |
320 |
5 |
Hardness of CW107C according DIN EN 12449 (wall thikckness – 10 mm)
Temper |
Hardness, HV |
Hardness, HB | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
|
min |
max |
min |
max |
H085 |
85 |
115 |
80 |
110 |
H110 |
110 |
140 |
105 |
135 |
H135 |
135 |
- |
130 |
- |
Mechanical properties of CW107C flat products Wieland
Temper |
Tensile strength, MPa |
Yield strength, MPa |
Elongation, % |
Electrical conductivty, MS/m |
Literature | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
min |
max | |||||
R300 |
300-340 |
max.240 |
min.20 |
35 |
41 |
|
R340 |
340-390 |
min 240 |
min.10 |
35 |
41 |
|
R370 |
370-430 |
min.330 |
min.6 |
35 |
41 |
|
R420 |
420-480 |
min.380 |
min.3 |
35 |
41 |
|
R470 |
470-530 |
min.440 |
min.4 |
35 |
41 |
|
R530 |
530-570 |
min.470 |
min.5 |
35 |
41 |
Hardness vs temper of CW107C
Temper |
HV |
Literature |
---|---|---|
H08 |
80-100 |
|
H10 |
100-120 |
|
H12 |
120-140 |
|
H13 |
130-150 |
|
H14 |
140-160 |
|
H15 |
150-170 |
Mechanical properties of CuFe1P according to SofiaMed
Temper |
Tensile strength MPa |
Yield strength MPa |
Hardness Vickers HV |
Elongation A10 % |
Literature |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
H02/R370/HV110 |
370-430 |
330 |
110-140 |
>8 |
|
H04/R415/HV125 |
415-480 |
380 |
125-145 |
>4 |
|
H08/R480/HH140 |
480-525 |
440 |
140-160 |
>3 |
|
H10/R530/HV150 |
530-570 |
470 |
150-170 |
>3 |
Electrical conductivity and thermal conductivity of 19400 strip in elevated temperature (annealed temper O60)
Temperature, ?C |
Thermal conductivity, W/mK |
Electrical conductivity/ MS/m |
---|---|---|
20 |
262 |
37,5 |
50 |
264 |
35 |
100 |
268 |
31 |
200 |
275 |
25 |
250 |
278 |
21 |
Electrical conductivity and thermal conductivity vs annealing temperature according data in table
Elastic modulus vs temperature of CW107C
Temperture, ºC |
Modulus E, GPa |
Literature |
---|---|---|
-200 |
128 |
|
-125 |
126 |
|
-75 |
124 |
|
25 |
121 |
|
100 |
118 |
|
150 |
116 |
|
200 |
114 |
Elastic modulus vs elevated temperature
Typical room-temperature and low-temperature (cryogenic) properties of C19400
Temperature, ?C |
Tensile strength, MPa |
Yield strength, MPa |
Elongation, 50, % |
---|---|---|---|
20 |
325 |
170 |
28 |
20 |
405 |
360 |
15 |
20 |
455 |
405 |
10 |
-196 |
475 |
195 |
38 |
-196 |
570 |
425 |
30 |
-196 |
615 |
485 |
23 |
Softening Resistance: Leadframes are a perfect example of the type of processing that can cause parts to soften and subsequently fail. During packaging, they may be subjected to temperatures as high as 350°C for several minutes. Below figure shows the softening behavior of CW107C (C19400) and some other copper leadframe materials at 350°C. The resistance to softening exhibited by C19400 enables it to maintain the strength required to resist deformation in handling and automated assembly of the device onto a printed circuit board.
Softening behavior of CuFe2P and various lead frame copper alloys at 350°C
Typical elevated temperature properties of annealed C19400 strip
Temperature, °C |
Tensile strength, MPa |
Yield strength, MPa |
Literature |
---|---|---|---|
20 |
341 |
150 |
|
65 |
324 |
144 |
|
95 |
313 |
144 |
|
120 |
300 |
144 |
|
150 |
289 |
139 |
|
175 |
276 |
135 |
|
205 |
266 |
131 |
|
230 |
253 |
131 |
|
260 |
235 |
127 |
|
290 |
219 |
123 |
|
315 |
203 |
116 |
Tensile strength, yield strength vs annealing temperature according data in table
Typical response of C19400 strip
Temperature, °C |
Tensile strength, MPa |
Yield strength, MPa |
Elongation, 50, % |
Literature |
---|---|---|---|---|
100 |
460 |
450 |
3 |
|
205 |
450 |
435 |
5 |
|
315 |
440 |
415 |
9 |
|
370 |
415 |
385 |
12 |
|
425 |
415 |
360 |
14 |
|
480 |
400 |
345 |
16 |
|
540 |
385 |
310 |
17 |
|
595 |
350 |
220 |
23 |
|
650 |
315 |
140 |
33 |
|
705 |
310 |
115 |
34 |
|
760 |
305 |
110 |
36 |
|
815 |
305 |
110 |
36 |
Tensile strength, yield strength and elongation vs annealing temperature according data in table
Vickers hardness after heat treatment (Temper R420, typical values)
Softening curve of CuFe2P according Kobe
Softening characteristic at 500 °C (hard soldering, laser, resistance welding of cuFe2P, CuETP and CuZn10
DSC curves of CuFe2P (C19400) alloy with heating rate of 10 °C/min
Specimens chemical composition (see following graphs for mechanical/electrical vs temperature properties
Specimens No |
Fe |
P |
Fe+P |
---|---|---|---|
% wt. | |||
C1 |
0 |
0,00 |
0,00 |
C2 |
2,48 |
0,43 |
2,91 |
C3 |
2,38 |
0,67 |
3,05 |
C4 |
1,96 |
0,95 |
2,91 |
C5 |
1,52 |
1,44 |
2,96 |
C6 |
0,97 |
1,96 |
2,93 |
D1 |
3,94 |
0,00 |
3,94 |
D2 |
3,39 |
0,64 |
4,03 |
D3 |
3,18 |
0,90 |
4,08 |
D4 |
2,53 |
1,46 |
3,99 |
D5 |
1,94 |
2,04 |
3,98 |
Age-hardening of several Cu-F2P alloys (specimen C3)
Age-hardening of several Cu-F2P alloys (Specimen D3)
Influence of tempering time on the hardness of specimen C3 quenched from 900°C
Influence of tempering time on the hardness of specimen D3 quenched from 900°C
Change of mechanical properties (Specimens C3)
Change of mechanical properties (Specimens D3)
Type of corrosion | Suitability | Literature |
---|---|---|
Atmospheric | Good | |
Marine environment | Good | |
Stress crack | Good | |
Hydrogen embrittlement | Not resistant | |
Electrolytic | Fair |
Stress relaxation resistance is critical to the maintenance of contact force over the life of an interconnect and therefore plays a role in the reliability of the system. Alloy C19400 has good stress relaxation resistance to temperatures of 105°C and is superior to copper C11000 and brass C26000.
Stress relaxation performance of C19400 (CW107C) (hard (HRO4) selected hard temper copper alloys at 75°C)
Stress relaxation behavior of CW107C for different temperatures. Test conditions: initial stress 65% Yield stress, time: 5000 h.
Stress vs temperature for C19400 strip
Stress remaining after 1000 hours of high performance copper alloys
Creep strength min, MPa properties of annealed C19400 strip (Stress causing creep of 0,01% per 1000h at 10000h test) -
| Temperature, °C | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
120 | 150 | 175 | 205 | 230 | 260 | 290 | 315 | |
Tensile strength, MPa | 300 | 289 | 276 | 266 | 253 | 235 | 219 | 203 |
Creep strength, MPa | 190 | 171 | 143 | 124 | 110 | 96 | 84 | 74 |
Creep strength vs temperature
Rupture stress vs temperature
Fatigue strength vs tensile strength, C19400, H04
Temper |
Tensile strength, MPa |
Fatigue strength, MPa |
Literature |
---|---|---|---|
HO4 |
450 |
141 |
|
HO8 |
485 |
145 |
|
H10 |
505 |
145 |
|
H14 |
530 |
148 |
|
HO4 |
min 550 |
141 |
Fatigue strength vs tensile strength of C19400
Beandability
|
H01 |
H02 |
H03 |
H04 |
H06 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
0.10<s<0,25 mm |
Transverse |
0 x s |
0.5 x s |
0.5 x s |
0.5 x s |
Parallel |
0 x s |
0.5 x s |
0.5 x s |
1.0 x s |
|
0.25<s |
Transverse |
0 x s |
1 x s |
1 x s |
1.5 x s |
Parallel |
0 x s |
1.0 x s |
2.0 x s |
3.0 x s |
Fabrication properties
![]() |
Value | Comments | |
Soldering | Excellent | ||
Brazing | Excellent | ||
Hot dip tinning | Excellent | ||
Electrolytic tinning | Excellent | ||
Laser welding | Good | ||
Oxyacetylene Welding | Good | ||
Gas Shielded Arc Welding | Excellent | ||
Coated Metal Arc Welding | Not Recommended | ||
Resistance welding | Good | ||
Spot Weld | Not Recommended | ||
Seam Weld | Not Recommended | ||
Butt Weld | Not Recommended | ||
Capacity for Being Cold Worked | Excellent | ||
Capacity for Being Hot Formed | Fair | ||
Forgeability Rating | 65 | C37700 (forging brass) | |
Machinability Rating | 20-25 | C36000 (free-cutting brass) |
Workability – cold working: Initial material was cold worked with rolling reduction: 20% (4.0 mm-3.18 mm), 30% (4.0 mm-2.70 mm), 50% (4.0 mm-1.94 mm), 70% (4.0 mm-1.22 mm), Then mechanical properties and electrical conductivity were investigated. The results of mechanical properties determinations are presented graphically in Fig. 19 and 20. In Fig. 19 average values of ultimate tensile strength (UTS), yield strength (YS) and elongation (A10) for initial samples (after cold rolling from 15mm to 4.0 mm and annealing) are marked on y-axis. Average UTS value was 434 MPa, average YS value was 373 MPa and average elongation A10 value was 10.8%. It was discovered, that hardness did not change significantly up to 70% of rolling reduction, and for this rolling reduction the lowest electrical conductivity was obtained.
Rolling reduction effect on ultimate tensile strength , yield strength and elongation of CuFe2P
Hardness and electrical conductivity vs rolling reduction of CuFe2P
Workability – heat treatment- [7.22]: Specimens 2 mm wide 12 mm thick and 100mm long from the middle of a 12 mm thick hot-rolled strip of C19400 alloy. Their composition: Fe:2,2, P:0,03,Zn:0,12%. The hot rolled specimens were ground to 10 mm in thickness to eliminate the oxidized layer and cold rolled to 2,5 mm in thickness by using a two –roll cold-rolling mill. Next they were solution-treated at 800°C, 900°C and 950°C by immersing them for 1 hour in salt bath and then quenched in water. Then they were cold-rolled to 1 mm in thickness. Next some specimen were not solution-treated, but instead directly cold-rolled to 1 mm in thickness. Temperature of ageing: 450, 500, 550, 600 and 650°C for 2,5,10 and 24 hours.
Variation in electrical conductivity after 1st cold rolling after solution treatment and after 2nd cold rolling
Rate of decrease in electrical conductivity vs % reduction (cold rolling) in different aging temperatures (specimens without solution treatment)
Rate of decrease in electrical conductivity vs % reduction (cold rolling) in different aging temperatures (solution treatment 950°C)
Vickers hardness after final cold-rolling as a function of reduction (without solution heat treatment)
Vickers hardness after final cold-rolling as a function of reduction (solution heat treatment – 950°C)
The sheet samples (CuFe2.2P0.05Zn0.16) with 100x10x1.6 mm in thickness were machined from the rectangular cast to solid solution under 850°C for 1 h then hot-rolling, water cooling and cold rolling. Subsequently, the samples were dealt by three-time rolling and two-time aging, that is , first cold rolling, first aging, second cold rolling, second ageing and final fine rolling to sheets about 0.2 mm in thickness and stress-release heat treatment
Table Process parameters of thermo-mechanical deformation
No |
D, mm |
FRT, mm |
FAT, °C |
SRT, mm |
SAT, °C |
TRT, mm |
SRAT, °C |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 |
1.4 |
1.0 |
500 |
0.5 |
450 |
0.2 |
330 |
2 |
1.4 |
1.0 |
500 |
0.3 |
450 |
0.2 |
330 |
3 |
1.4 |
0.8 |
500 |
0.4 |
450 |
0.2 |
330 |
4 |
1.4 |
0.8 |
500 |
0.3 |
450 |
0.2 |
330 |
5 |
1.4 |
0.65 |
500 |
0.3 |
450 |
0.2 |
330 |
6 |
1.4 |
0.65 |
500 |
0.25 |
450 |
0.2 |
330 |
Note: D: for the thickness of starting sample; |
The ageing temperatures of thermo-mechanical treatment
FAT, °C |
SAT, °C |
FAT, °C |
SAT, °C |
---|---|---|---|
550 |
500 |
525 |
500 |
550 |
475 |
525 |
475 |
550 |
450 |
525 |
450 |
550 |
425 |
525 |
425 |
550 |
500 |
475 |
475 |
550 |
475 |
475 |
450 |
550 |
450 |
475 |
425 |
550 |
425 |
475 |
|
Note: FAT: for the first ageing temperature; SAT: for the second ageing temperature |
Fig. 26. Electrical conductivity of sheets for diferent technological options
The optimized process was as follows: The strip with 1.4 mm thickness was first rolled to 1.0 mm and first aged at 5000C for 2 hours, and second rolled to 0.3 mm and second aged at 450°C for 2 hours, and finally rolled to 0.2 mm and stress-release annealed at 3000C for one hour. The related properties were shown in below table. It was found that final product with relatively good properties , such as the conductivity was 68,5 %IACS and microhardness was 149,9 HV .
The properties of C19400 alloys manufactured using the optimized process
Process |
1.4 mm |
1.0 mm |
500°C/2h |
0.3 mm |
4500C/2h |
0.2 mm |
330°Cx1h |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Conductivity, %IACS |
- |
- |
- |
62.1 |
69.0 |
67.3 |
68.5 |
Microhardness, HV |
119.2 |
142.4 |
144.1 |
159.2 |
111.6 |
150.5 |
149.9 |
Combination properties of C19400 alloy with various finishing rolling temperatures
Finish temperature, °C |
Hardness, HV |
Elongation, % |
Tensile strength, MPa |
Electrical conductivity, %IACS |
---|---|---|---|---|
600-650 |
156 |
6.4 |
517 |
65.4 |
>750 |
161 |
6.9 |
540 |
68.5 |
Technological properties
|
||||||||
Melting temperature [°C] | Casting temperature [°C] | Castability | Annealling temperature [°C] | Homogenization temperature [°C] | Quenching temperature [°C] | Ageing temperature [°C] | Stress relievieng temperature [°C] | Hot working temperature [°C] |
1080-1090![]() | No data | No data | 450-700![]() Comments: 1-3h 700-815 ![]() | No data | No data | No data | 200-300![]() Comments: 1-3h | 800-900![]() 825-950 ![]() |
